Analyst-led competitive intelligence: battlecards, deep-dive profiles, pricing intelligence, and continuous monitoring, built from primary research your rivals cannot see coming.
or explore engagement modelsImplementation speed. Their average go-live runs 3x longer. Lead every deal with time-to-value.
Brand recognition. Neutralize with named client proof and your analyst-access guarantee.
"Ask them how many of their case studies are less than two years old."
Source: Crayon, State of Competitive Intelligence 2025
One-page, sales-ready: how to win against each named rival, kept current.
The full dossier: strategy, products, pricing, go-to-market, people, and money.
Street pricing, deal structures, and discount behavior gathered ethically from the field.
Structured interviews with your won and lost accounts. The truth about why deals close.
Facilitated sessions that pressure-test your plan against likely competitor responses.
Monthly movement briefs plus real-time alerts on pricing, launches, leadership, and funding.
Teams that arm sales with battlecards report real results: 71% say win rates improved, and of those, 93% saw improvement above 20%.
Source: Crayon and SCIP, State of Competitive Intelligence 2021
Get the Sample BattlecardEvery engagement is scoped to your competitor set and the decision you face. You get a fixed written quote before any work begins.
Five honest questions. The industry average score is 3.8 out of 10. See where you stand.
We agree your key intelligence questions and named competitor set. Week zero.
Secondary sweep across filings, patents, pricing, and hiring data, then primary work: expert interviews, channel checks, customer conversations.
Findings benchmarked against your capabilities and strategy. Intelligence in a vacuum is trivia.
Executive briefing, sales enablement handoff, and an agreed update cadence so the intelligence stays alive.
Client names are withheld under NDA, as is standard in competitive intelligence. Ask us to walk you through full deliverables on a scoping call.
An APAC-based medical devices manufacturer was preparing its US entry against two established incumbents. Internal pricing assumptions were built on published list prices only. Before committing to a launch price and distributor terms, leadership needed to know what rivals actually charged after discounting, and how they would likely respond to a new entrant.
A chemicals leader was tracking rivals through fragmented internal efforts: sales anecdotes, ad-hoc Google alerts, and quarterly deck-building sprints. Capacity and pricing moves by three named competitors kept surfacing through customers first, leaving the strategy team explaining surprises instead of anticipating them.
A fast-growing SaaS company with 60 sellers was losing competitive deals with no shared view of its rivals, no in-house analyst, and no appetite to hire one. When the board asked for the competitive win rate, nobody could answer with confidence.
Name your competitors and the decision you are facing. A senior CI analyst, not a salesperson, replies with an initial read and the sample battlecard within one business day.